Monthly Archives: March 2017
What next, including roof trusses…
Roof trusses
Refreshed from our festive break, I got back in touch with Stevenson & Kelly. I arranged to send my plans over to get an estimate. The architect has specified separate trusses and joists. The trusses are to be raised-tie i.e. a standard truss but with an extra timber on either side to extend them far enough to rest on the raised wallhead, but also provides the depth to insulate the roof.
They got back quite quickly, asking why we were not using attic trusses, they would be cheaper than what was planned. I asked the architect. He replied that he had used both designs and had problems with attic trusses where the building was at all wonky (as ours is). He thought the installation would be more tricky – we would probably want to buy in help and a bigger crane and may have trouble accommodating variations in our walls.
S&K came back to say they did not think they could design trusses as specified. I left the architect to talk with them, but asked them for a quote for attic trusses with easijoists. It came back at under £10k, which I was pleasantly surprised about.
I showed the architect the proposed design. He pointed out that, as designed, there was not enough room to insulate the trusses. If they were enlarged enough to allow us to use PIR foam insulation, the trusses would cost more, plus PIR insulation costs more than the mineral wool panels in the building warrant. Enlarging the trusses again to use the mineral wool insulation panels would increase the cost of the trusses again. Or we could add timber inside the trusses to create the additional depth for insulation, but this would lower and narrow the ceiling. We also noted that attic trusses could not have the joists shallower than 300mm, whilst separate easijoists could be 200mm deep.
On my last call to S&K, they did own up that they could design trusses as designed, but they would be more expensive than attic trusses.
I concluded that we would accurately measure heights on our next visit and see whether that 10cm difference would really matter.
Next block of work
Ric suggested he could do a long stint – 8-9 weeks in the period March-May. He suggested a) more on surface water drains, b) tidying up spoil, c) preparing for a floor slab and d) laying the floor slab. I would fly up for the first couple of days to get him settled in in March. We would go up for two weeks over Easter. We booked him in.
A few other things